Survivalist News Network

Are We Being Forced Into a “Second American Civil War ”… If So, Who Will Win?

A culture war has been stirred up.

Divisions are along predictable lines: racism, police abuse, controversial social issues, and plenty of left vs. right, demographics and regional baggage to clash over as well.

And by all accounts, differences and distinctions between people have been intensifying, not blurring and fading away.

According to the Washington Post, many Americans have been relocating themselves in one of the 11 distinct areas of the country to live with like minded people.

The best way to keep us from fighting the real enemy is to keep us fighting amongst ourselves.

But could the culture war ever turn into a real war?

Some people actually think so, and it seems the military has been planning for the scenario, too. The potential for economic and societal breakdown is real.

As Infowars previously reported:

The U.S. military agrees that the chance of a break down in the system is real:

A new report from the U.S. Army War College [here is the report] discusses the use of American troops to quell civil unrest brought about by a worsening economic crisis.

The report from the War College’s Strategic Studies Institute warns that the U.S. military must prepare for a “violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States” that could be provoked by “unforeseen economic collapse” or “loss of functioning political and legal order.” [The report also warns of a possible “rapid dissolution of public order in all or significant parts of the US.”]

Former Governor Rick Perry made a lot of noise about succession in Texas. A Russian scholar even predicted the break up of the United States into six parts (with the bankers secretly in control of the pieces, and the grander North American Union:

He also cited the “vulnerable political setup”, “lack of unified national laws”, and “divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions.”

He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts – the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population; the South, with its Hispanics; Texas, where independence movements are on the rise; the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality; five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations; and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.

Here’s part of the long answer that one former Marine, Jon Davis, gave to the question, “If every state of the USA declared war against each other, which would win?.”


These are the accounts of the Second American Civil War, also known as the Wars of Reunification and the American Warring States Period.

After the breakup many wondered which states would come out in control of the power void created by the dissolution of the United States. There were many with little chance against several of the larger more powerful states.The states in possession of a large population, predisposition for military bases and a population open to the idea of warfare fared the best. In the long term we would look to states with self-sufficiency and long term military capabilities.



Here are the states that held the greatest strategic value from day one. They have the ability to be self-sufficient, economic strength, military strength, the will to fight and the population to support a powerful war machine.

New York
Others that have many of the qualities that gave them an advantage are also listed.


His full answer includes sample journals from the nearly 3,000 day war he envisions (which is now being optioned by Hollywood). To make a long story short, California, Texas and New York become the power bases for the 2nd American Civil War, and each carves out an empire from the mainland of allied or subjugated states, which add to the balance of resources.

Here is Davis’ final map and full account:



The attempts to reunify the former nation are shaky at best.

Things may not be as simply as carefully divided states, but there are already many layers of conflict throughout society, and some of it has already turned to violence, riots and bloodshed.

Unfortunately, it can happen here. But will it?

How much farther will things go? And will any notice the hidden hand behind those events?

Who are the real controllers, and who stands to gain from a new civil war?

By Mac Slavo

If you liked this article you might also be interested in learning more about Real, Proven Survival Strategies When Money Turns Into Dust.




(Visited 114 times, 1 visits today)

Comments (9)

  1. […] Are We Being Forced Into a “Second American Civil War ”… If So, Who Will Win? […]

  2. […] Are We Being Forced Into a “Second American Civil War ”… If So, Who Will Win? […]

  3. […] Are We Being Forced Into a “Second American Civil War ”… If So, Who Will Win? […]

  4. […] a certain CIA “strategic asset” – are looking for signs that Syria’s four-year old, bloody civil war might mark the beginning of the apocalypse, look no further than the Svalbard Global Seed Vault […]

  5. Draciron Smith

    I am not buying the map. The key division will be cultural I feel. The coasts against the rest of the nation with Hawaii breaking off completely and Alaska either siding with the Rebels or declaring independence. California and Texas will be natural central points for the two nations, though Easter California tends to be Conservative, as well as parts of Northern Cali. Eastern Oregon and Washington the same. As such militarily the West coast might be undefendable. They have large population centers but are also full of people unwilling to fight. The bulk of combat vets will be in the Central states. A large percentage of Conservatives which will be a significant chunk of active duty military and vets will tend to side with the Rebels. The NE and Rust belt will be easier to defend. UN troops will almost certainly be brought in to help defend, as well as Canadian troops.

    The most likely scenario is Federalists (NE states, Northern Illinois, Northern Indiana, Minnesota, Hawaii if it doesn’t succeed, Northern Ohio, Michigan, Maryland, Western California, New Mexico, Western Oregon, Western Washington)

    Neutral states/Contested states. Colorado, West Virginia, Virginia, North Carolina, Nevada, Wisconsin, Eastern California, Eastern Oregon, Eastern Washington, Kentucky, Louisiana

    Rebel states Texas, Oklahoma, Montana, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Arizona, Idaho, Wyoming, Iowa South Carolina

    Questions. Tennessee, There has been enough Liberal votes and candidates in Tennessee to make one wonder if the volunteer state will take a side or be split.
    Arkansas, the NW is staunchly Conservative and would be very difficult to take militarily. The Ozarks would thwart any but the most serious and well led invasion. The rest of Arkansas is split. Little Rock is heavily Liberal, but many of them would probably flee to the NE if war broke out. A number would switch sides and fight for the Rebels. There are enough to make Arkansas questionable. The elected officials would not rebel though. They would side with the Federalists and transfer as much military resources out of Arkansas as they could.

    The NE still has a significant manufacturing edge. Especially in terms of arms and munitions. Gun laws however are rapidly driving many of these companies to friendlier states. If Hillary wins the presidency, then many of these companies might relocate before her oath of office. The Boeing facilities in Seattle will be an important military target. Texas in particular has a lot of rocket technology and manufacturing as well as a lot of aerospace engineering and manufacturing and computer manufacturing. The ports are split, but the Rebels will have more defensible ports. The Eastern Harbors are easy targets. Many of the Western harbors will be destroyed in the fighting or held by rebel sailors and supplied by sea. So the East will have to rely heavily upon Canadian harbors and the great lakes for incoming supplies. The East lacks food production and manufacturing of basic necessities. The East is also heavily energy dependent and would see rolling black outs as a norm. SoCal would see it’s water cut off and would find food and water difficult to procure. The seemingly intentional sabotaging of irrigation and driving farmers out of California will work heavily against SoCal. So too will the influx of UN troops and volunteers from South/Central America.

    The Rebels have an age issue. The bulk of the fighters will be 30+ with significant numbers over the age of 40. Air power is critical for the Rebels as many parts of their territory are going to be extremely vulnerable to air power. West Texas, Arizona, most of Wyoming, large swaths of the rest of Rebel territory are flat plains. Few mountains, jungles or forests to hide from cruise missiles & air strikes. Little terrain to discourage the use of tanks either.

    Propaganda will be another critical area. Winning the hearts and minds of the NE will make or break the Federalist army. If assimilated Americans in the NE believe in the fight, they will provide competent and solid troops. If the bulk of the troops are radicalized Liberals, they will fall like wheat on the battlefield and will be very short on fight. UN troops will be generally inferior in quality or motivation but generally well supplied and have lots of armor & air power to back them up. If assimilated Americans are not behind their efforts, sabotage will negate them to a great extent and Western nations will quickly pull their troops out and replace them with cannon fodder from third world nations. As such winning the hearts and minds of the Boston Irish, the country folk up in Main, NH, Vermont, etc will be critical.

    Racism however is a certain way to not only lose the battle for the hearts and minds of Yankees, but also drive Asians and Indians as well as a large number of Hispanics into the arms of the Federalists. A “White” America is not a realistic option nor even desirable. There would be a serious brain drain as well as a serious loss in fighting age men as well as important skills if this were to happen. If you compare Whites with other groups, under 50, Whites are outnumbered. If a third of the Whites in the US are fighting for the Federalists and another third unwilling to fight for either side, then the Rebels will be hopelessly outnumbered, manufacturing and industry would be impossible to maintain and the Federalist would have a serious technological edge.

    The idea of multiple countries is absurd. The Russian report and similar reports are focusing on trivial matters to divide the nation. Utah for example would NEVER be part of a California dominated nation. It would go against every ounce of belief in Utah. 1 on 1 Utah is easily a match for California. While Utah has a much lower population, California could not count on a large part of their population to actually fight. Nor would they be effective or motivated soldiers. Utah would see extremely motivated and skilled warriors who were better equipped and trained than their Californian peers. Folks in Utah are also very dogged about defending their land. Wyoming alone could probably defeat an invasion by California, and like Utah there is NO WAY Wyoming would become part of a nation led by California. They would have to erase 90% of the population and resettle to accomplish this. Arizona alone would be contested for decades with vicious fighting. That is alone. Given the support of states like Texas and Oklahoma there is no way that Utah or Wyoming falls at all or for long to Californian forces. Not without a mass genocide of 100 million or more. Essentially Whites, assimilated Asians, Hispanics and Indians would have to be wiped off the face of the Earth for such a thing to happen.

    So we have to discard this map. It is not realistic. In reality the states would fall very much along party lines. Those that are Red states would band together against Blue states. The rural areas of many Blue states would defect to the Red nation. The urban areas of many Red states would see mass migration or become combat zones.

    A min of 10 million would die in such a war. WW III which would be the inevitable result of destabilizing the US would kill at least a billion people and the US either as parts or a whole would be drawn into WW III once the civil war was over. The risk of biological or nuclear weapons being used are quite high, though a full exchange is unlikely. What is more likely is Iran nuking Israel and Israeli retaliations, Pakistan & India lobbing nukes at each other and North & South Korea doing the same. This would be intolerable to the rest of the world and these nations would soon be bombed into the stone age and their nukes mostly destroyed. A few terrorist nukes would likely be detonated but that would probably be the end of it. Biological weapons however are scarier and pose a much greater threat. They could easily create a total SHTF situation.

    In conclusion, the likelihood of civil war is quite high if Hillary is elected. Not sure how we made it through Obama’s term, though things came close. If a couple governors like Perry hadn’t blinked we would already be at war. Too many backed down over Obamarcare and watched the RINOs sell out the nation over and over again. With Hillary there’s no choice. We were on the brink the last time a Clinton was in the White house. It’ll be back to the Waco style raids, back to the IRS hounding Conservatives, back to the war on anybody who MIGHT speak out against the Clintons. If a RINO wins, like Rubio or Bush, then the risk is moderate. Enough will go right to keep the pressure from boiling over. The problem is amnesty might well be passed and that would likely be the last straw. The election of Cruz would likely bring the nation back. Cruz reminds me a great deal of Reagan and he’ll win over a lot of people who are Obama supporters before he’s done I feel. So the risk would be extremely low. Though Left wing terrorist groups would sprout up. The risk of a Nicaragua style genocide is high no matter who wins, if we do not go to open war. The Rebels I feel would win. SoCal, the Rust belt and NE US would initially be independent, then join the EU. The rest of the US would be the US of old. Maybe even eventually Western Canada would join us. The Federalists would probably pick another war and lose. This would leave the US resettling SoCal and parts of former Federalist states. Western Europe doesn’t have the stomach or resources for real war any more. The EU backing would quickly evaporate and the Federalist states would be in deep trouble after that. Assuming they were not too busy fighting off Russia and Muslim Africa.

    • Greg Merriweather

      I do view a forthcoming civil war, but more in terms of reasserting the Constitution and its underlying Judeo-Christian foundation as the cornerstone of society than about territory. Liberals are weak, don’t like guns, and like those before them, entirely reliant upon enlarged gov’t to tie their shoes. They oppress by perversion of the rule of law and re-cutting of the social fabric so as to redefine right and wrong, the result being a society and legal system that rots away and dies, leaving chaos. The civil war is one in which the seats of local, state, and federal gov’t are purged of these individuals — not by mass graves, but by designating them as traitors and therefore merely unable to participate in leadership. Anyone that receives a dollar or more from the gov’t has a conflict of interest and thus barred from voting or political participation. There is no concept of race, creed, gender or any distinctions other a record of leftist political activity or gov’t dependency. There is no need for bloodshed beyond enforcing laws that are necessary to keep leftist from participating in political leadership in the same way we exclude convicted felons. Simply put, those with clear records of contributing to the ruination are barred. Most woman would be barred by this action as would all registered democrats, and this prohibition would last for ten years. In addition, term limits of a single term for nearly all public offices would eliminate manipulation of the process and ingrained constituencies that vote themselves treasure. The Country would be forthwith liberated from there pernicious deviants where it was their own plain efforts to destroy our society by turning against it that resulted in their period of exclusion. Rather than being shot and tossed in mass graves, this conservative revolution would ironically bring liberty, prosperity, and greater happiness to the overwhelming mass of the vanquished that likely would rather just put up with it than die opposing it.

  6. […] Are We Being Forced Into a “Second American Civil War ”… If So, Who Will Win? […]

  7. […] Are We Being Forced Into a “Second American Civil War ”… If So, Who Will Win? […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.